A great officer of state who had anciently several courts underhis jurisdiction, as the court of chivalry and the court of honor. Under him is theherald’s office, or college of arms. He was also a judge of the Marslialsea court, nowabolished. This office is of great antiquity, and has been for several ages hereditary inthe family of the Howards. 3 Bl. Comm. G8, 103; 3 Steph. Comm. 335, note.
Archive | E RSS feed for this section
The dignity or jurisdiction of an earl. The dignity only remains now, as the jurisdictionhas been given over to the sheriff. 1 Bl. Comm. 339.
Money given in part payment. See EARNEST.
The money a person earns from working at a job.
If an insured person pays for a policy in advance, the “earned” premium is the portion of the policy that has already been used.
The payment of a part of the price of goods sold, or the delivery of partof such goods, for the purpose of binding the contract. Ilowe v. Hayward, 108 Mass. 54, 11 Am. Rep. 300.A token or pledge passing between the parties, by way of evidence, or ratification of the sale. 2 Kent, Comm. 495, note.
These are the monies that a person is able to earn that results from skills and training.
This term is used to denote a larger class of credits than would be includedin the term “wages.” Somers v. Keliher, 115 Mass. 105; Jenks v. Dyer, 102 Mass. 235.The gains of the person derived from his services or labor without the aid of capital.Brown v. Hebard, 20 Wis. 330, 91 Am. Dee. 408; Iloyt v. White, 40 N. H. 48.
The amount of net income earned by a company, after PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS have been distributed, which is attributable to each outstanding share of COMMON STOCK. The EPS measure is used as a reflection of earnings power and corporate value; it is typically calculated on a FULLY DILUTED BASIS, which assumes that all outstanding stock OPTIONS are exercised, and any outstanding CONVERTIBLE BONDS are exchanged into new shares. The general computation is given as: where Nl is net aftertax income, Divpref is preferred stock dividends, and CS0/s is the weighted average common stock shares outstanding (including those associated with options and convertible bonds for a fullydiluted calculation).
Soil of all kinds, including gravel, clay, loam, and the like, in distinction fromthe firm rock. Dickinson v. Pough- keepsie, 75 N. Y. 70.
A right in the owner of one parcel of land, by reason of such ownership,to use the land of another for a special purpose not inconsistent with a general property in the owner. 2 Waslib. Real Prop. 25.A privilege which the owner of one adjacent tenement hath of another, existing in respect of their several tenements, by which that owner against whose tenement theprivilege exists is obliged to suffer or not to do something on or in regard to his ownland for the advantage of him in whose land the privilege exists. Termes de la Ley.A private easement is a privilege, service, or convenience which one neighbor has ofanother, by prescription, grant, or necessary implication, and without profit; as a wayover his land, a gate-way, water-course, and the like. Kiteh. 105; 3 Cruise, Dig. 484.And see Harrison v. Boring, 44 Tex. 207; Albright v. Cortright, 04 N. J. Law, 330, 45 Atl.034, 48 L. R. A. 010, 81 Am. St. Rep. 504; Wynn v. Garland, 19 Ark. 23, 08 Am. Dec.190; Wessels v. Colebank, 174 111. 018, 51 N. E. 039; Terminal Land Co. v. Muir, 130Cal. 30, 08 Pac. 308; Stevenson v. Wallace, 27 Grat. (Va.) 87.The land against which the easement or privilege exists is called the “servient”tenement, and the estate to which it is annexed tlie “dominant” tenement; and theirowners are called respectively the “servient” and “dominant” owner. These terms aretaken from the civil law.Synonyms. At the present day, the distinction between an “easement” and a”license” is well settled and fully recognized, although it becomes difficult in some of thecases to discover a substantial difference between them. An easement, it has appeared,is a liberty, privilege, or advantage in land, without profit, and existing distinct from theownership of the soil; and it has appeared, also, that a claim for an easement must befounded upon a deed or writing, or upon prescription, which supposes one. It is apermanent interest in another’s land, with a right to enjoy it fully and withoutobstruction. A license, on the other hand, is a bare authority to do a certain act or series of acts upon another’s land, without possessing any estate therein; and, it being founded in personal confidence, it is not assignable, and it is gone if the owner of the land who gives the license transfers his title to another, or if either party die. Cook v.Railroad Co.. 40 Iowa, 450; Nunnelly v. Iron Co.. 94 Tenn. 397, 29 S. W. 301. 28 L. It.A. 421; Baldwin v. Tavlor, 100 Pa. 507, 31 Atl. 250; Clark v. Glidden, 00 Vt. 702. 15 Atl.358; Asher v. Johnson. 118 Ky. 702, 82 S. W. 300.Classification. Easements are classified as affirmative or negative; the former being those where the servient estate must permit some- tliinw to be done thereon, (as to pass over it, or to discharge water upon it;) the latter being those where the owner of the servient estate is prohibited from doing something otherwise lawful upon his estate, because it will affect the dominant estate, (as interrupting the light and air from the latter by building on the former.) 2 Washb. Real Prop. 301. Equitable L. Assur. Soc. v. Brennan (Sup.) 24 N. Y.Supp. 788; Pierce v. Keator, 70 N. Y. 447, 26 Am. Rep. 612. They are also either continuous or discontinuous. An easement of the former kind is one that is self perpetuating,independent of human intervention, as, the flow of a stream, or one which may be enjoyed without any act on the part of the person entitled thereto, such as a spout which discharges the water whenever it rains, a drain by which surface water is carried off, windows which admit light and air, and the like. Lampman v. Milks,21 N. Y. 505; Bonelli v. Blakemore. 60 Miss. 130, 5 South. 228. 14 Am. St. Rep. 550;Providence Tool Co. v. Engine Co., 9 R. I. 571. A continuous easement is sometimes termed an “apparent” easement, and defined as one depending on some artificial structure upon, or natural conformation of, the servient tenement, obvious and Eermanent, which constitutes the easement or ! the means of enjoying it. Fetters v.Humphreys, 18 N. J. Eq. 260: Larsen v. Peterson. 53 N. J. Eq. 8S, 30 Atl. 1094; Whalenv. Land Co.. 65 N. J. Law, 206, 47 Atl. 443. Discontinuous, non-continuous, or nonapparenteasements are those the enjoyment of which can be had only by theinterference of man, as. a right of way or a right to draw water. Outerbridge v. Phelps,45 N. Y. Super. Ct. 570; Lampman v. Milks, 21 N. Y. 515. This distinction is derivedfrom the French law. Easements are also classed as private or public, the former beingan easement the enjoyment of which is restricted to one or a few individuals, while apublic easement is one the right to the enjoyment of which is vested in the publicgenerally or in an entire community: such as an easement of passage on the publicstreets and highways or of navigation on a stream. Kennelly v. Jersey City, 57 N. J.Law, 293. 30 Atl. 531. 26 L. R. A. 281; Nicoll v. Telephone Co., 62 N. J. Law, 733, 42Atl. 583, 72 Am. St. Rep. 666. They may also be either of necessity or of convenience.The former is the case where the easement is indispensable to the enjoyment of thedominant estate; the latter, where the easement increases the facility, comfort, or convenienceof the enjoyment of the dominant estate, or of some right connected with it.Easements are again either appurtenant or in gross. An appurtenant easement is onewhich is attached to and passes with the dominant tenement as an appurtenancethereof; while an easement in gross is not appurtenant to any estate in land (or notbelonging to any person by virtue of his ownership of an estate in land) but a merepersonal interest in. or right to use, the land of another. Cndwalader v. Bailev. 17 R. I.495. 23 Atl. 20. 14 L. R. A. 300; Pinkum v. Eau Claire. 81 Wis. 301. 51 N. W. 550;Stovall v. Coggins Granite Co., 116 Ga. 376, 42 S. E. 723.
This phrase means a proper or a pure easement that passes to new owner by inheritance or purchase.
This when another person’s property has been used for a long period of time and is not obtained legally but by custom.
the right given to use a pathway or a road to a property that belongs to another person to give access to a road.
State, 11 Ark. 491; Atchison St. It. Co. v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.. 31 Kan. 661, 3 Pac. 284; Orr v. Quimby, 54 N. H. 613. 7. In the law of contracts, an obligation; a deed, whereby the obligor acknowledges himself to owe to the obligee a certain sum of money or some other thing. It may be indented or poll, and with or without a penalty.
In the customs laws of the United States, the term “countries east of theCape of Good Hope” means countries with which, formerly, the United States ordinarilycarried on commercial intercourse by passing around that cape. Powers v. Comley, 101U. S. 790, 25 L. Ed. 805.
The name of a royal manor in the county of Keut, England;mentioned In royal grants or patents, as descriptive of the tenure of free socage.
The East India Company was originally established forprosecuting the trade between England and India, which they acquired a right to carryon exclusively. Since the middle of the last century, however, the company’s political affairshad become of more importance than their commerce. In 1858, by 21 & 22 Vict, c.106, the government of the territories of the company was transferred to the crown.Wharton.
A coin struck by Richard II. which is supposed to have given rise to the name of “sterling,” as applied to English money.
An easterly coast or country.
Featuring Black’s Law Dictionary
Enter your email address to stay current on legal news and receive special offers