way Co., So Mo. 5SS; Railroad Co. v. Bell, 112 Pa. 400, 4 Atl. 50; Lewis v. Seifert, 110 Pa. (‘.28, 11 Atl. 514, 2 Am. St. Rep. 031; Minneapolis v. Lund in, 58 Fed. 525, 7 C. C. A. 344; I.indvall v. Woods (C. C.) 44 Fed. 855; Perras v. Rootli, 82 Minn. 101, S4 N. W. 730; Van Onsen v. Letellier, 73 Mich. 402. 44 N. W. 572; I